Skip to main content

Combine-ing Football and Physics

There are many ways football analysts can describe a player. 

He's a high energy player...hits with a lot of force...has exceptional power…puts in the work. For the most part we all understand what is meant when these types of words are used to describe some physical attribute of a player. However, in the world of physics each of the words I used above has a specific meaning and, you guessed it, a formula. This is going to dive into what is sometimes referred to as Newtonian (or Classical) Mechanics, which looks at how forces applied to objects create and influence motion. This is, of course, named after Sir Isaac Newton, the founder of gravity and partially credited with inventing calculus (I'm team Leibniz, but that's maybe for a later time). You may have heard of Newton's Three Laws of Motion - that's what we're going to explore here and relate the mechanics of motion to the NFL combine. 

Newton discovering gravity by getting donked in the head by an apple

Why take a look at combine data in this way?

At the 2022 Combine Jordan Davis, who weighs 341 pounds, ran 40 yards in 4.78 seconds and folks all around the NFL were stunned. The NFL used the eye screaming face emoji in a tweet. People were shocked that someone so big moved so fast. Check out the NFL Network's reaction:
Jordan Davis ran 4.78 weighing 341lbs; Tristan Wirfs ran 4.85 weighing 320lbs; Calvin Johnson ran 4.35 weighing 239lbs; Taylor Mays ran 4.31 weighing 230lbs. All of these are extremely impressive but since we have to rank and debate everything -- which is the most impressive?  How about Wirf’s vertical jump of 36.5 inches compared to Mario Williams jumping 40.5 inches weighing 290lbs? That’s where understanding combine events from a physics perspective can help. 

The key concepts

A quick review of some things to keep in mind:
Speed/velocity: Distance traveled over time (miles per hour, feet per second, or meters per second)
Mass: The amount of matter or "stuff" an object is composed of which gives resistance to motion. Mass isn't exactly the same as weight, but they're directly related through the constant pull of gravity. A person’s weight is their mass times the influence of gravity. As an equation, Weight = mass * gravity

Now onto the main concepts we are going to discuss: energy, work, and power. Putting an object in motion by applying a force to it requires energy, and this energy does work to move the object. The concepts or energy and work are similar enough for our purposes and both have the same unit of measure (Joules). The gist is energy is transferred to do work. Power is the rate in which work is done or energy is transferred. Since the unit of energy is Joules, power is Joules per second, which is called a Watt (not JJ, TJ, nor Derek, but James). Outside of lightbulbs and electricity, we aren't used to using the Watt as a unit of measurement so we can convert this to horsepower which is also a measure of power just scaled differently (around 746 Watts is 1 Horsepower). 

Magnus Samuelsson doing A LOT of work right here

Physics of NFL combine events

So how does this relate to football players running and jumping? Heavier players have more mass, which means more energy is needed to do work, e.g. running 40 yards. We can apply the concepts of energy, work, and power to more concisely characterize how a prospect tests during a combine event. 

We are going to look at two activities from the combine and put a new spin on those measurements: The 40 yard dash, where we will calculate average power output, and the vertical jump calculating energy/work. I put a couple of example calculations at the end of the post if you’re interested in taking a look. Using data from Pro Football Reference going back to the 2000 combine, here are the players with the highest output by position:


So how do we interpret this? Bruce Campbell (OL) and Dontay Moch (LB) had essentially the same power output in the 40yd dash (1.192 and 1.1846 hp, respectively). Moch ran 0.35 seconds faster, but he is outweighed by Campbell by 66 pounds and that extra mass, despite running much slower actually gives Campbell slightly more horsepower. Similarly with the vertical jump, Tristan Wirfs and Mario Williams produced close to the same amount of energy (1,319.7 and 1,349.9 Joules), with Williams out-jumping Wirfs by 4 inches but weighing 25 pounds less. 

A couple of notes, the position groups are pretty vague (e.g. DL includes both edge rushers and interior linemen since they were not consistently labeled on the data). Also, 40 yard power and vertical jump energy together do not paint a complete athletic picture as they fail to consider things like change of direction and agility, but they do show which players fair well with unidirectional movement. I would be comfortable calling players with high power and energy metrics “explosive.”

As always, I put this data into dashboards that you can explore. There you'll see that Jordan Davis is a beast, Vernon Davis demolished all other TEs, and defensive linemen are the most explosive position group. It’s also interesting to see who’s on the other end of this spectrum. I don’t want to spoil it, but the least explosive player just unretired in Florida. In the dashboard I also compare how these kinetic values of power and energy differentiate for combine participants that end up getting drafted to those that do not.

Click here to go to my Tableau Dashboard!

   

Formulas used and example calculations

m = mass, v = velocity, t = time, w = weight, d = distance
40 Yard Dash Energy (Work) = ½ * m * v²

40 Yard Dash Power in Watts = Energy/t

40 Yard Dash Horsepower = 40 Yard Dash Power in Watts/745.7

Vertical Jump Energy (Work) = w * d

In 2006 Vernon Davis (TE) weighed 254lbs, ran the 40 yard dash in 4.38 seconds, and jumped 42 inches in the vertical. First, we are going to convert units to metric (pounds to kg, yards to meters). To find his mass, we convert lbs to kilograms. 

254 lbs  115.2 kg (mass) 
40yds  36.58 meters  
Velocity, v = 36.58/4.38 = 8.35 meters/sec
Davis’ 40 Yd Energy = ½ * 115.2 * 8.35² = 4,016.016 Joules
Davis’ 40 Yd Power = Energy/time = 4,016.016/4.38 = 916.9 Watts
Davis’ 40 Yd Horsepower = 916.9/745.7 = 1.23 Horsepower

42 inches  1.067 meters
Remember that w = m * g, where g accounts for gravity (and g = 9.80665)
Vertical Jump Energy (Work) = 115.2 * 1.067 * 9.80665 = 1,205.83 Joules

Popular posts from this blog

Hitting the NBA Jackpot

Lotteries are typically really tough to win. Powerball, Mega Millions, and even state lotteries are all damn near impossible claim the jackpot. Even winning anything is pretty unlikely. Getting a Pick 5 (numbers 0-9) exactly right is 1 in 100,000. Getting luck enough to draft the next phenom like LeBron, Anthony Davis, or perhaps Zion Williamson? That's much, much easier than getting a few digits in the right order. NBA Draft System and Protected Picks A quick refresher: The NBA determines the selection order of the first 14 (of 30) teams for an upcoming draft of new players by a lottery system. These are teams that didn't make the playoffs. The rest of the draft order is determined by inverse order of regular season record. The NHL also has a lottery system for non-playoff teams but differs for teams in the post season where order is determined partially by playoff performance and regular season point total. In the NFL, non-playoff teams are ordered purely by regular sea...

First Post! What to expect from fantasy football starters (ideally, at least)?

Let's get into what I'm going to call  starter-worthy production. If you're in a 12-team league, with the typical two RB slots to fill, then the top 24 running backs are typically deemed "starters." To get a sense of how things may go for you this week, you visit your favorite rankings site to check out where your guys fall in the top 20 to 30 players at the position. But what point production should you feel good about from those players? Can we find a point threshold that helps identify production worthy of being in your starting lineup? Let's take a look...   I'm defining starter-worthy production for each week as the top 24 scores for RB and WR, and the top 12 scores for QB and TE. The dataset consists of the top scores for each week including 50 for RB/WR, 18 for QB, and 20 for TE. The splits were needed for simplicity and don’t change the analysis. Looking at the visualization below, the blue histogram shows what starter-worthy produ...

NCAA Bracket Help is Here (2019)

Last call for brackets! It's the last few hours and I am here to help. Even if the deadline passes use this to try and find any potential upsets. I used three classification models to predict each the winner of any match-up for the 2019 Men's basketball tournament. You can pick whichever model seems the best to you, or use the three in a voting scheme where majority picks the winner! To learn more about the model types (if you're interested) I used:  logistic regression  -  neural network  -  random forest Use the search bar to and type in both school names you are looking for, and the probabilities next to each model are the likelihood that predictor gives to School X winning the match-up. If you're having trouble with the table on this site, click here to open the table in a new window. As always, feel free to reach out with any feedback via email ( math.w.jerome@gmail.com ) or through twitter! Tweet to @MathWithJerome Follow @MathWit...